Google docs in google drive for collaborative reflective 2

of 12

Please download to get full document.

View again

All materials on our website are shared by users. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. We are always happy to assist you.
PDF
12 pages
0 downs
10 views
Share
Description
1. Melanie Alperstein, FHS, EDU, UCT 2. “The transformative act of reflection- the implicitbecomes explicit and new habits of mind develop”(Walt and Reis, 2010:…
Transcript
  • 1. Melanie Alperstein, FHS, EDU, UCT
  • 2. “The transformative act of reflection- the implicitbecomes explicit and new habits of mind develop”(Walt and Reis, 2010: 746).In Collaboration.........
  • 3.  Post Graduate Diploma in Health ProfessionalEducation (PG Dip HPE). blended learning programme with short faceto face block periods adult learners, busy clinicians the majoritywith many years teaching experience.
  • 4. Staff identify user friendly tool process to encourage and excite busyclinicians reflect critically on teaching,learning and assessmentStudents use the tool and process to sharereflections on shared reflection in a community ofpractice, teach their students
  • 5.  Compounding discourses and language Clinician – educator identities Reflective and academic writing Reflection is used in different ways, invarious contexts and the interpretation of itsmeaning differs struggle with e-learning initially.
  • 6.  reflective writing is non-collaborative the control of the type of feedback given andthe development of reflective writingremains in the control of the courseconvener (Rowe, Bozalek and Frantz, 2013.In press for BJET) Missed opportunity for collaborative learning
  • 7.  Google Docs/Google Drive vs blogs and trackchanges Easy – feedback clear/ not messy Target feedback on specific section ofdocument Small groups, less intimidation Google Drive multiple features
  • 8.  Buy-in forthe concept of collaborativelearning through using critical friends(Bozalek and Mathews, 2009) Start with small groups sharing. Whatever tool is used, it must be easy to use(free) and there should be training if needed Expect resistance from students and staffinitially – need staff buy in E- tool must enhance learning ‘task’ Staff must be familiar with and support thetechnology
  • 9.  Google Drive – small groups will be lessthreatening for participants to reflect ontheir Participants will be drawing on their real lifeexperiences. Freedom to chose what aspects they wish toreflect on, making it an authentic learningteaching, learning and assessment practices Trial with staff before implementing
  • 10.  Google Drive – multiple features – free up to5G storage – easy to download Collaborative working space Docs, spreadsheets, presentations, drawingand forms for surveys, online assessment Document versions, highlighting, editing – itgoes on Access wherever you are
  • 11.  Hope to pilot with 3 part time students nextsemester Work in progress Contact: melani.alp@gmail.com
  • 12.  Bozalek, V, and Mathews, L. (2009). E-Learning: A cross-institutional forum for sharing socio-culturalinfluences on personal and professional identity. International Social Work; 52, 235-246.DOI:10.1177/0020872808099733. Online version available at:http://isw.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/52/2/235. Brodahl, C. Hadjrrrouit, S. and Hansen, N.K. (2011). Collaborative writing with Web 2.0 Technologies:Education Students’ perceptions. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations inPractice, 10, 73 - 103. Donaghy, M. & and Morss, K. (2000). Guided reflection: A framework to facilitate and assess reflectivepractice within the discipline of physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 16, 3 -14. Hatton, N. and Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation.Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49. Hernández- Ramos, P. (2004). Web logs and Online Discussions as Tools to Promote Reflective Practice. TheJournal of Interactive Online Learning 3(1), 1-16. Kember, D, McKay, J, Sinclair, K, and Wong, F. (2008). A four-category scheme for coding and assessing thelevel of reflection in written work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 369-379. Rowe, M, Bozalek, V and Frantz, J. (2013 In Press for BJET) Using Google Drive to facilitate a blendedapproach to authentic learning. Wald, HS. and Reis, SP. (2010) beyond the Margins: Reflective Writing and Development of ReflectiveCapacity, Medical Education. J Gen Intern Med 25 (7), 746- 749. Wheeler, S. (2009). Learning Space Mashups: Combining Web 2.0 Tools to Create Collaborative andReflective Learning Spaces. Future Internet 1, 3-13; doi:10.3390/fi1010003.
  • Related Search
    We Need Your Support
    Thank you for visiting our website and your interest in our free products and services. We are nonprofit website to share and download documents. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us.

    Thanks to everyone for your continued support.

    No, Thanks